Back to articles

Myths and facts: fire safety in electric cars

Published: Mar 1, 2026

There is a great deal of confusion around EV fire safety, even though the available data generally shows that electric vehicles catch fire less often than conventional combustion-engine cars. This misconception is largely driven by amplified media attention, uncertainty around newer technology and the visibility of different firefighting procedures.

As electric vehicles become more common, questions about fire safety appear more often as well. Many people assume that because an EV contains a high-voltage battery, it must automatically be more dangerous than a conventional combustion-engine car. The available statistics generally do not support that conclusion.

The broader picture is usually the opposite: EV fires are rarer than fires in petrol or diesel vehicles, while some data sets even show higher fire rates for hybrids than for traditional cars. That is why the issue should not be judged by isolated incidents or impressions alone.

What do the statistics suggest?

Different sources use different methodologies, but the overall direction is similar: combustion-engine vehicles experience fires more often. Some U.S. summaries have suggested roughly 1,530 fires per 100,000 conventional vehicles, with hybrids sometimes showing even higher ratios, while EVs appear at much lower levels.

Swedish figures have pointed in a similar direction, with a very low fire ratio among electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles. Other international collections also emphasize that confirmed EV battery fires remain rare when compared with the total number of vehicle fires overall.

  • Combustion-engine vehicles contain fuel, oil and multiple other flammable materials that can contribute to fires.
  • Hybrids combine elements of both conventional and electric drivetrains, which may help explain some of the statistics.
  • EV battery fires receive outsized attention, but attention does not make them statistically more common.

Why does the EV fire myth persist?

One major reason is media attention. An electric-car fire still attracts far more headlines than an ordinary combustion-engine vehicle fire, even though the latter is much more common. That can make EV incidents feel disproportionately frequent in public perception.

Another factor is firefighting complexity. Battery-related fires may require different techniques and, in some cases, longer monitoring or intervention. That makes them more visible and memorable, but not necessarily more likely.

What matters about EV battery safety?

EV battery packs are engineered with multiple layers of protection. These may include cell separation, impact protection, temperature monitoring and software-based battery management. Their purpose is to reduce the risk of overheating, damage and abnormal operation as much as possible.

It is also important to understand that a battery fire can behave differently from a conventional fuel fire. That does not make it automatically more probable, only different in how it must be managed. Fire services around the world continue to refine their EV response protocols, which improves preparedness over time.

Everyday risk should not be judged by viral stories

Exceptional and dramatic incidents spread much faster online than the quiet majority of uneventful journeys. That can distort risk perception. If we want to compare drivetrain safety fairly, larger data sets and interpretable statistics matter much more than isolated videos, posts or comment threads.

Summary

Most misconceptions about EV fire safety come not from actual fire rates, but from visibility. Based on the data commonly cited, EVs catch fire less often overall than conventional combustion-engine vehicles. Battery systems may require specific handling, but that is not the same as being inherently more dangerous. Ongoing technical development and strict safety standards continue to strengthen EV fire safety.